To test for associations among agriculture and schistosomiasis, we conducted collaborative research with 23 communities in the St. Louis-Richard Toll region of Senegal (Fig. 1), quantifying the amount of (i)agricultural fields, fertilizer, and other agrochemical applications within a 0.5-km radius from the center of each village, (ii) submerged aquatic vegetation in water access points, (iii) snails that transmit human Schistosoma worms, and (iv) human Schistosoma infections in ~1,700 schoolchildren.
The best fitting path model (Fig. 2, from Rohr et al. 2023.) provided support for the hypothesis that agriculture increases fertilizer use, which increases nutrient and snail habitat in waterbodies, and this in turn fuels snails, Schistosoma parasites, and schistosomiasis prevalence in schoolchildren (Fig. 1).
Given the positive association between agriculture and the prevalence of Schistosoma infections that seems to be mediated by aquatic vegetation, we predicted that we could disrupt this relationship and increase open water access (see Water tab for water results) by removing vegetation from water access points (Fig. 3).
To test this hypothesis, we implemented a three-year cluster randomized controlled trial in 16 communities (i.e., clusters) in Senegal, quantifying effort to remove vegetation and abundance of snails, aquatic vegetation, open water, and Schistosoma infections in >1,400 schoolchildren before and after vegetation removal in half of the communities. All infected schoolchildren received praziquantel annually to treat Schistosoma infections regardless of whether Schistosoma eggs were detected in their feces or urine.
We removed an estimated 433 metric tons (wet weight) of submerged aquatic vegetation during the study (Fig. 4a). Vegetation removal was associated with an 8-fold reduction in snails in the following year (Fig. 4c). The more vegetation we removed, the more Biomphalaria and Bulinus snail abundance declined (Fig. 4b). Control sites had 1.46 times the S. mansoni infection rate of the removal sites (Fig. 4d), or in other words, the infection rate in schoolchildren in the vegetation removal sites was 68% of the infection rate observed in the control sites (Fig. 4e, from Rohr et al. 2023.).